Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 19:44:22 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 252812] bhyve(8) doesn't mention vale but it appears to be supported Message-ID: <bug-252812-9@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D252812 Bug ID: 252812 Summary: bhyve(8) doesn't mention vale but it appears to be supported Product: Documentation Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Many People Priority: --- Component: Manual Pages Assignee: bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: okiddle@yahoo.co.uk CC: doc@FreeBSD.org It appears to be perfectly possible to pass, e.g. -s 5,virtio-net,vale0:vm1= to bhyve and it will create a virtualised network attached to a VALE switch. It should be listed in bhyve(8) alongside the tapN, vmnetN and (for FreeBSD 13) netgraph options. In practice, I didn't get very far when trying to get it to work. Attaching= my physical interface with valectl -h appeared not to work so perhaps that dep= ends on driver support. I think I had it working for networking between VMs. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-252812-9>