From owner-freebsd-current  Sat Sep 23 18:46:55 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3D1E37B424
	for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 23 Sep 2000 18:46:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from wollman@localhost)
	by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id VAA34295;
	Sat, 23 Sep 2000 21:44:21 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from wollman)
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2000 21:44:21 -0400 (EDT)
From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
Message-Id: <200009240144.VAA34295@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
To: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@cup.hp.com>
Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: mtree again
In-Reply-To: <39CD3698.D2EF0663@cup.hp.com>
References: <20000915033837.A564@nagual.pp.ru>
	<200009142341.RAA00700@harmony.village.org>
	<20000915043925.A83698@nagual.pp.ru>
	<39CD3698.D2EF0663@cup.hp.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

<<On Sat, 23 Sep 2000 16:02:48 -0700, Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@cup.hp.com> said:

> Is their any harm in just keeping the -P flag as a no-op and optionally
> remove it at some later time (for backward compatibility)?

We should try to be consistent with POSIX.1-200x as much as possible.

-GAWollman



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message