From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Jul 1 14:44:54 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AFE537B400 for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2002 14:44:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.smluc.org (smluc.org [206.138.44.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B4B1E43E09 for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2002 14:44:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from erik@www.smluc.org) Received: (qmail 21599 invoked by uid 1000); 1 Jul 2002 21:48:54 -0000 Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 16:48:54 -0500 From: Erik Greenwald To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/40091: print/gnomeprint needs graphics/gdk-pixbuf but doesn't list it as a dependancy Message-ID: <20020701214854.GA21517@lazarus.smluc.org> Reply-To: 200207011947.g61Jlo0q013998@freefall.freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Synopsis: print/gnomeprint needs graphics/gdk-pixbuf but doesn't list it > as a dependancy > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > State-Changed-By: marcus > State-Changed-When: Mon Jul 1 12:47:03 PDT 2002 > State-Changed-Why: > gdk-pixbuf is a dependency of gnomeprint via the USE_GNOME knob. Do a > make package-depends from within the gnomeprint directory, and you will > see gdk-pixbuf as a dependency. > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=40091 > um, ok, oops, also sent a couple more like that... my bad It sits wrong with me to have it require that define. I was building the parts of gnome I knew I wanted, and was getting these weird and easily avoidable errors... if people with less patience try it, they may just decide that fbsd sucks and is broken instead of trying to track it back to the error. The ports I mention should at least try to set USE_GNOME if it's required, I think that no matter where the user tries to build, it should never give a blind error like that... package-depends... cool, wish I would've known about this earlier :) package-depends-list looks even more useful, but they're both undocumented... should I write description lines in the Mk/bsd.port.mk file just to list them? how many other 'hidden' targets are there? :) maybe I'll have to read that whole file instead of just the comment docs -- -Erik [http://math.smsu.edu/~erik] The opinions expressed by me are not necessarily opinions. In all probability, they are random rambling, and to be ignored. Failure to ignore may result in severe boredom or confusion. Shake well before opening. Keep Refrigerated. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message