Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2022 12:46:01 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: xfce@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 265378] x11/xfce4-goodies can depend on sysutils/xfce4-battery-plugin when battery-plugin is unbuildable Message-ID: <bug-265378-28711-ydvb1T36pL@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-265378-28711@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-265378-28711@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D265378 --- Comment #4 from Guido Falsi <madpilot@FreeBSD.org> --- Created attachment 235425 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D235425&action= =3Dedit patch v1 I've attached a patch I've still not tested. The patch removed BATTERY from the global defaults and puts it in OPTIONS_DEFAULT_amd64 and OPTIONS_DEFAULT_i386, so it's not the default exc= ept where supported. I've also added some OPTIONS_EXCLUDE_${ARCH}. To keep the list short I deci= ded to only add the ones relating to the architecture supported by HEAD (upcomi= ng 14.x), as a compromise. aarch64 was very important to add since it's becoming tier 1. BTW I have no way of testing the xfce4-battery-plugin plugin on aarch64, bu= t if you want to give it a spin, just comment the ONLY_FOR_ARCHS (or add aarch64) there and see how it behaves. If it happens to work on aarch64 I can enable= it. BTW while here I am enabling BSDCPUFREQ by default again since it should wo= rk now (I'm going to test this before committing anyway). --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-265378-28711-ydvb1T36pL>