From owner-freebsd-chat  Tue Jan 28 11:30:56 1997
Return-Path: <owner-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA04735
          for chat-outgoing; Tue, 28 Jan 1997 11:30:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tibet.stepnet.com (tibet.stepnet.com [206.14.120.100])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA04729
          for <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 1997 11:30:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from ping@localhost) by tibet.stepnet.com (8.7.6/8.7.3) id LAA01581 for freebsd-chat@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Jan 1997 11:30:37 -0800 (PST)
From: Ping Mai <ping@stepnet.com>
Message-Id: <199701281930.LAA01581@tibet.stepnet.com>
Subject: Walnut Creek config
To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 1997 11:30:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL22 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

with all the debate over cisco routers vs serial cards,
i am curious as to what the walnet creek server use for
its t3 connections.

forget i asked if this is a trade secret or some sort.

ping