From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Apr  6 10:50:34 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: x11@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57E3216A404;
	Fri,  6 Apr 2007 10:50:34 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from andy@athame.co.uk)
Received: from hex.athame.co.uk (salama58.adsl.netsonic.fi [81.17.207.58])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DDAB13C48A;
	Fri,  6 Apr 2007 10:50:33 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from andy@athame.co.uk)
Received: from [192.168.10.15]
	by hex.athame.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.66 (FreeBSD))
	(envelope-from <andy@athame.co.uk>)
	id 1HZlZR-000HxX-Nm; Fri, 06 Apr 2007 13:21:29 +0300
From: Andy Fawcett <andy@athame.co.uk>
To: kde-freebsd@kde.org
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 13:21:37 +0300
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6
References: <200704051229.27994.lists@jnielsen.net>
	<200704061139.02450.lofi@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <200704061139.02450.lofi@freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200704061321.39206.andy@athame.co.uk>
Cc: x11@freebsd.org, kde@freebsd.org, Michael Nottebrock <lofi@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: [kde-freebsd] qt upgrade strangeness
X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support <freebsd-x11.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11>,
	<mailto:freebsd-x11-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-x11>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-x11@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-x11-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11>,
	<mailto:freebsd-x11-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2007 10:50:34 -0000

On Friday 06 April 2007 12:38:58 Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> On Thursday, 5. April 2007, John Nielsen wrote:
> > I'd like to determine if 1) this is a known problem
>
> No.
>
> > and 2) this is specific
> > to the Xorg ports tree so I know whether or not to send in a PR.
>
> Could be, at least I haven't seen it on my system yet which runs the ports
> xorg.

Not seen it here with either i386 & ports xorg, or amd64 & the xorg 
experimental stuff.

A.

-- 
Andy Fawcett                                     | andy@athame.co.uk
                                                 | tap@kde.org
"In an open world without walls and fences,      | tap@lspace.org
  we wouldn't need Windows and Gates."  -- anon  | tap@fruitsalad.org