From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 9 07:04:34 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E17A716A4BF for ; Tue, 9 Sep 2003 07:04:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B10243FA3 for ; Tue, 9 Sep 2003 07:04:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eischen@vigrid.com) Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4]) by mail.pcnet.com (8.12.8/8.12.1) with ESMTP id h89E4Stp028689; Tue, 9 Sep 2003 10:04:28 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 10:04:28 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen X-Sender: eischen@pcnet5.pcnet.com To: Harald Schmalzbauer In-Reply-To: <200309090942.17317@harrymail> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: -pthread deprecated, but when? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2003 14:04:35 -0000 On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > On Tuesday 09 September 2003 06:23, leafy wrote: > > IMO this deprecation deserves a place in UPDATING. And what are the > > plans to Do The Right Thing? QT currently does not compile on -current > > with the -pthread deprecated. > > Was port@ informed before the change? Yes. > Not only qt isn't compiling any more on -current and I'm not sure if anybody > is aware that ports can't be compiled on -current (at least the one I tried). > Only the mozilla stuff has been patched so far. > > I'm also very interested what the plans are to Do The Right Thing. See ${PTHREAD_LIBS} and ports@ -- Dan Eischen