From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Jan 28 19:25: 9 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from chmls16.mediaone.net (chmls16.mediaone.net [24.147.1.151]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1346537B417 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 19:25:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from photoniii (h0005025b549e.ne.mediaone.net [66.31.5.199]) by chmls16.mediaone.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id g0T3OHP03941; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 22:24:20 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 22:30:21 -0500 From: Tadayuki OKADA To: Alexander Leidinger Cc: tadayuki.okada@windriver.com, mi@aldan.algebra.com, will@csociety.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/graphics/gd Makefile pkg-comment Message-Id: <20020128223021.7c626859.tadayuki@mediaone.net> In-Reply-To: <200201281003.g0SA3Jw02159@Magelan.Leidinger.net> References: <20020127230146.16179bd3.tadayuki@mediaone.net> <200201281003.g0SA3Jw02159@Magelan.Leidinger.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386--freebsd4.5) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello Alexander, First, let me summarize what's you're saying. You admit that PORTREVISION bump is necessary. To upgrade ports, one should use portupgrade. # BTW, it's not 'portupdate'. It's an improvement because people can chose not to updadte shlibs. Do I understand you right? About PORTREVISION, Mikhail thinks otherwise. On Wed, 23 Jan 2002 20:43:09 -0500 (EST) Mikhail Teterin wrote: > The reason port A needs upgrading should not be the PORTREVISON > somewhere, but the mere fact, that port B, for which there is a > lib-dependency, is being upgraded. If portupgrade does not do this, it > should -- always -- with or without my modifications. But you think it's necessary, right? About portupgrade, I think people should be able to handle ports with base system. But if you think otherwise, I won't argue about it. One thing I want to ask you is: Why optinal knob is no better than Mikhail's proposal? With the knob, people actually can chose to update shlib or not to. > What if this port only works with freetype library versions greater than > 4? Please check ports/graphic/gd/Makefile. I just added '.ifdef'. If you can accept his change, why not this? Regards, -- Tadayuki OKADA To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message