From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Sep 9 23:44:31 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8CE5A009FF for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 23:44:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from allan@physics.umn.edu) Received: from mail.physics.umn.edu (smtp.spa.umn.edu [128.101.220.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 892851A2C for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 23:44:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from allan@physics.umn.edu) Received: from spa-sysadm-01.spa.umn.edu ([134.84.199.8]) by mail.physics.umn.edu with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ZZp2U-0009Yy-3i for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 18:44:30 -0500 Message-ID: <55F0C448.7070808@physics.umn.edu> Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 18:44:08 -0500 From: Graham Allan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Storage question References: <55EF3D23.5060009@hiwaay.net> <20150908220639.20412cbd@gumby.homeunix.com> <55EF5409.8020007@yahoo.com> <55EFC2DA.3020101@hiwaay.net> <08B351DD-AA48-4F30-B0D6-C500D0877FB3@lafn.org> <55F02DC8.7000706@hiwaay.net> <20150909150626.5c3b99e5.freebsd@edvax.de> <55F031A0.40500@hiwaay.net> <55F0A0E7.1060709@sneakertech.com> <55F0A7AB.3000802@physics.umn.edu> <55F0AB5C.5020205@sneakertech.com> In-Reply-To: <55F0AB5C.5020205@sneakertech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 23:44:31 -0000 On 9/9/2015 4:57 PM, Quartz wrote: >> The 9.3 installer includes automatic ZFS partitioning too; > > Wait, really? I thought zfs-on-root was one of the big new things for 10? It's certainly confusing, but I guess it's because 9.3 post-dates 10.0. G.