Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 14 Jul 2012 22:15:34 -0700
From:      Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org>
To:        Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>
Cc:        svn-doc-head@freebsd.org, svn-doc-all@freebsd.org, doc-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r39205 - head/en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs
Message-ID:  <CAF6rxg=U8Vrs%2BX9aNhQYx0FFuKSkxki-f9ZoBdoDVaML1L%2BmZQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <50023C9A.3090601@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <201207150321.q6F3LRoJ023039@svn.freebsd.org> <50023C9A.3090601@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 14 July 2012 20:44, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On 07/14/2012 20:21, Eitan Adler wrote:
>>   Reset buttons were always a bad idea [0]
>>
>>   [0] http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20000416.html
>
> While I think a lot of what's in that page is good UI advice, it also
> mentions some other issues that should be addressed regarding the
> equivalent functionality that I'm not sure are fully satisfied with the
> current page.

Could you explain a bit more?

> Also, was this change discussed anywhere? While removing severity and
> priority was almost certainly a good idea, removing the reset button
> should probably have been discussed first.

It wasn't discussed, but I don't really see the need to: reset buttons
have zero value.



-- 
Eitan Adler
Source & Ports committer
X11, Bugbusting teams



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxg=U8Vrs%2BX9aNhQYx0FFuKSkxki-f9ZoBdoDVaML1L%2BmZQ>