From owner-freebsd-bugs Thu Jun 21 13:30: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FD2837B401 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 13:30:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f5LKU3w93400; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 13:30:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 13:30:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200106212030.f5LKU3w93400@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Ian Dowse Subject: Re: bin/28325: NFS_NOSERVER kernel option causes zillions of syslog messages Reply-To: Ian Dowse Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR bin/28325; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ian Dowse To: Vivek Khera Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/28325: NFS_NOSERVER kernel option causes zillions of syslog messages Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 21:24:35 +0100 In message <15154.21394.258675.13215@onceler.kciLink.com>, Vivek Khera writes: > >ID> What mount options are you using? It looks as if you either asked >ID> for NQNFS or kerberos, neither of which are likely to work well. > >I use NQNFS (-q option to mount). Why would this not be expected to >work? The mount_nfs man page says nothing about it. Thanks. NQNFS is an experimental protocol based on NFSv2 that is not in wide use, and it's implementation has suffered significant bit-rot over the years. Unless you have a really good reason to use it and you understand fully what it is and what it does, I'd advise using the newer and much more widely used NFSv3, which is the default anyway. Ian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message