From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Jan 15 16:38:02 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id QAA10374 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 15 Jan 1997 16:38:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [204.216.27.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id QAA10369 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 1997 16:38:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from awfulhak.demon.co.uk (awfulhak.demon.co.uk [158.152.17.1]) by who.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.11) with ESMTP id QAA29370 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 1997 16:37:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from awfulhak.demon.co.uk (localhost.coverform.lan [127.0.0.1]) by awfulhak.demon.co.uk (8.8.4/8.7.3) with ESMTP id AAA15155; Thu, 16 Jan 1997 00:23:43 GMT Message-Id: <199701160023.AAA15155@awfulhak.demon.co.uk> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.9 8/22/96 To: Archie Cobbs cc: julian@whistle.com, danny@panda.hilink.com.au, ejs@bfd.com, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, archie@alpo.whistle.com Subject: Re: FreeBSD as an ISDN Router In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 14 Jan 1997 21:09:34 PST." <199701150509.VAA20578@bubba.whistle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 16 Jan 1997 00:23:43 +0000 From: Brian Somers Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk [.....] > > If it's got Charles Mott's alias stuff in it, it should be worth replacing > > usr.sbin/ppp with it - it would be nice to have both in the same program ;) > > If it hasn't, I'd be happy to merge them. > > Unfortunately, it doesn't... > > In which case this effort might be better spent porting the alias > stuff to divert(4) sockets, instead of a user-mode ppp daemon. Then > it will be more generally useful, since plenty of folks will probably > want to stick with ppp (instead of mpd). > > I'd be happy to advise, though it shouldn't be too difficult. > > MHO, > -Archie Do you mean that mpd isn't configurable as a single-line ppp daemon ? I was thinking along the lines of it being a user-land ppp that can sit on a variable number of serial lines. BTW, how does mpd do its load balancing ? Does it just send packets to the interface with the smallest buffer queue ? -- Brian , Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour....