From owner-freebsd-security  Wed Jan 12  3:51:21 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from ns1.via-net-works.net.ar (ns1.via-net-works.net.ar [200.10.100.10])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1EE814D1D
	for <security@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 03:51:17 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from fpscha@ns1.via-net-works.net.ar)
Received: (from fpscha@localhost)
          by ns1.via-net-works.net.ar (8.8.5/8.8.4)
	  id IAA07522; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 08:51:33 -0300 (GMT)
From: Fernando Schapachnik <fpscha@ns1.via-net-works.net.ar>
Message-Id: <200001121151.IAA07522@ns1.via-net-works.net.ar>
Subject: Re: UUCP over SSH tunnel?
In-Reply-To: <20000111220728.I5375@speedy.gsinet> from Gerhard Sittig at "Jan 11, 0 10:07:28 pm"
To: Gerhard.Sittig@gmx.net (Gerhard Sittig)
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 08:51:33 -0300 (GMT)
Cc: security@FreeBSD.ORG
Reply-To: Fernando Schapachnik <fpscha@via-net-works.net.ar>
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL40 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

En un mensaje anterior, Gerhard Sittig escribió:
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2000 at 09:56 -0300, Fernando Schapachnik wrote:
> > 
> > and create a script that:
> > 
> > ssh -l account -L 540:server:540 server
> > calls uucico
> > kills ssh.
> 
> That would be too harsh a reaction, I guess.  One could issue a
> command like "ssh [opts] server sleep 10" since ssh will
> terminate when the command AND the tunnelled connections are
> gone.

Good idea, but wouldn't work as you are using /bin/cat as your shell. 
On the other hand, you may be able to create a script that sleeps a 
few seconds and then exits. Using this as a shell might do the job.

Regards.


Fernando P. Schapachnik
Administración de la red
VIA NET.WORKS ARGENTINA S.A.
fernando@via-net-works.net.ar
(54-11) 4323-3333


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message