Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 10:49:26 +0200 From: Koop Mast <kwm@rainbow-runner.nl> To: Beeblebrox <zaphod@berentweb.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: poudriere sillieness re audio/libsamplerate & glib20 Message-ID: <5163D616.4000905@rainbow-runner.nl> In-Reply-To: <1365496402007-5802546.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <1365479312444-5802508.post@n5.nabble.com> <CAO%2BPfDfSk2uO7nmf3hU-gXCfGUzG2dsFJRvjxASkjnCLgzFsjQ@mail.gmail.com> <1365493098467-5802539.post@n5.nabble.com> <CA%2B7WWSe3Ghh76J2qKnwnC9yY%2B8tyofHxK_d4fjmtr9GkiFJxKw@mail.gmail.com> <1365496402007-5802546.post@n5.nabble.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 9-4-2013 10:33, Beeblebrox wrote: >>> How do you know it's supposed to be glib20 and not _glib20? > I don't, but what I DO know is that after the 2 corrections (star1 and 2 > from post #2), the error messages in the form of 'Unknown component _glib20' > cleared out and the dependent ports got built by poudriere. So that was > Makefile related. If not, suggest how it is to be fixed so that the error no > longer occurs. Thats correct, _glib20 is removed in the gnome devel repo, because it no longer needed. The reason why ports use it was to avoid a dependancy on gamin and gio-fam-backend. I admit that MC is currently unstable, but you should have mentioned if your using a non vanilla ports tree. Otherwise people will just assume your only having ports without extra patches. -Koop >>> Evenmore you haven't shown anything that would point to a problem in >>> poudriere itself. > a. First item in post #1? I asked if there is a way to get libsamplerate in > poudriere > b. My thread is not limited to problems with 2 ports, since there are a good > number of problems which I am posting as fast as much as I can gather the > details. > c. As posted in #2: colord-0.1.20_1, libsoup-2.42.0, wxgtk2-common-2.8.12 > get built on host but not in poudriere. As shown, the errors are trivial > (like 'cannot find sqlite3' when the sqlite3.txz is in fact located in the > repo) and furthermore, packages built manually and placed in the common > repo are summarily deleted by poudriere at repo-check stage. > > What more does one need before referring to all of this as "sillieness"? I > do not know where the source problem lies exactly, so I am reporting my > findings. > > > > ----- > 10-Current-amd64-portstree merged with marcuscom.gnome3 & xorg.devel > -- > View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/poudriere-sillieness-re-audio-libsamplerate-glib20-tp5802508p5802546.html > Sent from the freebsd-ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5163D616.4000905>