From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 19 14:50:32 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C366416A4CE for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 14:50:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from relay.rdsnet.ro (gimli.rdsnet.ro [193.231.236.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CDBE443D58 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 14:50:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com) Received: (qmail 19825 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2005 14:46:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.rdsnet.ro) (62.231.74.130) by smtp1-133.rdsnet.ro with SMTP; 19 Jan 2005 14:46:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 11657 invoked by uid 89); 19 Jan 2005 14:51:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO it.buh.tecnik93.com) (81.196.204.98) by 0 with SMTP; 19 Jan 2005 14:51:27 -0000 Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (localhost.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AAC7114CF; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 16:50:28 +0200 (EET) Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 16:50:28 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: Fernan Aguero Message-ID: <20050119165028.64956966@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <20050119142448.GD33158@iib.unsam.edu.ar> References: <6f9c15f8050118105132e37e02@mail.gmail.com> <41ED88C0.1090805@FreeBSD.org> <6f9c15f805011817175e3e821@mail.gmail.com> <20050119032851.5d402a3e@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <20050119142448.GD33158@iib.unsam.edu.ar> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.13 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org cc: Bill Coffman Subject: Re: port versions X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 14:50:32 -0000 [ dropped ale@ this has nothing to do with mysql now ] On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 11:24:48 -0300 Fernan Aguero wrote: > +----[ Ion-Mihai Tetcu (18.Jan.2005 22:33): > | > | > Since we're on the subject, I was wondering about other conventions > | > for port versions. Sometimes it's "_1" or "_2" and sometimes it's > | > like "p5-DBD-mysql40-2.9004_1". Is there any reason for all these, or > | > are they just left to the variable discretion of the port maintainer? > | > | No. Reason: > | > | /usr/share/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/makefile-naming.html > | > +----] > > I don't have it by that name, but under > /usr/share/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/x400.html Possible, I didn't rebuild my docs for some time now. > As already explained in a previous message, everything that > is added after the port version, either in the package name > or when registering the port (usually in /var/db/pkg), come > from different variables defined in the ports Makefile > > PORTNAME= abc > PORTVERSION= x gets added after portname as -x (abc-x) > PORTREVISION= y gets added as _y (abc-x_y) > PORTEPOCH= z gets added as ,z (abc-x_y,z) Yes, I know, I maintain a few ports. I just didn't see any reason to write what's already written in PH. -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"