Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:25:51 +0200
From:      =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
To:        Dimitry Andric <dimitry@andric.com>
Cc:        randy@psg.com, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net>
Subject:   Re: termcap under single luser
Message-ID:  <864p5q4dyo.fsf@ds4.des.no>
In-Reply-To: <48981B7A.6080205@andric.com> (Dimitry Andric's message of "Tue,  05 Aug 2008 11:20:58 %2B0200")
References:  <200808041330.m74DUsg9075683@lurza.secnetix.de> <48970C5E.6000406@andric.com> <20080804230919.H1629@plexi.pun-pun.prv> <20080805013704.GA90232@over-yonder.net> <48981B7A.6080205@andric.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dimitry Andric <dimitry@andric.com> writes:
> Indeed, it would be much better to only put /boot in a separate
> filesystem, if that were possible without none-too-clean hacks. :)

It would be trivial if boot1 and loader were smart enough to detect when
loader is in / instead of /boot/.  Implementation is left as an exercise
to the reader.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?864p5q4dyo.fsf>