From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 19 10:03:36 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B51616A46B; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 10:03:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (transport.cksoft.de [62.111.66.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2DE213C48A; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 10:03:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id F129E1FFAAE; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 11:31:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id 2AD9F1FF92F; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 11:30:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net (maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net [10.111.66.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD92F4448DD; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 09:27:10 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 09:27:10 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net To: Mark Linimon In-Reply-To: <20070619065304.GA460@soaustin.net> Message-ID: <20070619092242.E98813@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <20070619065304.GA460@soaustin.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS cksoft-s20020300-20031204bz on transport.cksoft.de Cc: linimon@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: request: state of the art of jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 10:03:36 -0000 On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Mark Linimon wrote: Hi, > I have a customer who is interested in expanding jails to include > multiple IP addresses. Since from my reading the Network Virtualization > work isn't imminent, I'm looking to see who else has worked on this (and > jails in general). There is an extant patch in kern/69064 which I'm > looking at but would need refinement. Are there others? I have an almost HEAD version based on what pjd did some years ago. Have been running it on multiple RELENG_6 machines in production. It might need slight modifications for HEAD after rwatsons recent commits but I'll do that anyway the next days. Apart from that I've been told that andre was working on a thing that is somewhere is the middle between marco's vnet/vimage work and the multi-ip-jail patch. Last but not least there was a SoC project I think and there are "parallel" patches out there with a partly different featureset (resource limits, etc.) but I haven't looked at them in detail. /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT Software is harder than hardware so better get it right the first time.