From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 2 05:38:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 405801065670 for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2009 05:38:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pluknet@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f210.google.com (mail-fx0-f210.google.com [209.85.220.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C78FA8FC0A for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2009 05:38:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm6 with SMTP id 6so533091fxm.43 for ; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 22:37:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=AxgN4MGAFGY4el8aTz7M9NRyKCShFwTbSGEbwRfNxLc=; b=Ruzk9i8lGTJyi6el1IfhGG+CYk/220KsuX6BVBgCEz1eT7+MeswuHImPMgfgN5i/wj bbp1MflRN4FTpryfX19u9CJSnT9OeIFRct1XldqZEd0iIsbxans0JVk4UAcsjpYpGd37 raoJpiXiZIwxK6o+18JzJMN9eXa/LO3tBpyrY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ZKYo+CcpGQvGx/nKOq5lrXZEuEggW7MedWnMSl7/pYq4JXmhrEvuN3csIkfWaDDoTc DiC2xLsCTAjlrJNWD0zzIHIAj9KxBMke0CiEn0hTE+finR1S1gq98o8Y9hKesw/jQApg 6PsBSr1b/3j+7qXures9eL2gQlDkEFBr5J49E= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.156.28 with SMTP id u28mr1773070bkw.74.1251869879326; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 22:37:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20090831204506.GA6464@keira.kiwi-computer.com> References: <1287213639.20090831194947@ngs.ru> <20090831184045.GA5846@keira.kiwi-computer.com> <448086815.20090901031952@ngs.ru> <20090831204506.GA6464@keira.kiwi-computer.com> Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 09:37:59 +0400 Message-ID: From: pluknet To: rick-freebsd2008@kiwi-computer.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, bossic@ngs.ru Subject: Re: 64-bit inodes X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 05:38:01 -0000 2009/9/1 Rick C. Petty : > On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 03:19:52AM +0700, bossic@ngs.ru wrote: >> > On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 07:49:47PM +0700, bossic@ngs.ru wrote: >> >> Good time of day! >> >> I have a question about 64-bit inodes. Some software (for example >> >> glusterfs http://www.gluster.org/) don't work on operation systems th= is >> >> type of inodes support >> >> without. Will FreeBSD support 64-bit inodes? And when expect it? >> >> > UFS2 uses 64-bit block numbers and 64-bit times. =A0Not sure about ZFS= , but I >> > know it supports at least 64-bit block pointers. =A0I'm not exactly su= re what >> > you mean by "support 64-bit inodes". =A0Certainly FreeBSD supports >> > filesystems that use 64-bit pointers and timestamps. >> >> Hi! I need to work the packet glusterfs. But I have next: "Distribute >> translator: uses 64bit inode numbers, as FreeBSD doesn't support 64bit >> inodes. Distribute is seen to not work on FreeBSD" on >> http://www.gluster.org/docs/index.php/Whats_New_v2.0 and >> http://www.mavetju.org/weblog/html/00262.html . What can I do? This >> packet working on Linux, but have "core dumped" on FreeBSD. There is >> not big problem to debug it for me, but definition of bug is lower >> hands me. > > [CC'd to the list for additional comments] > btw, NetBSD switched ino_t to uint64_t four years ago (so it was shipped in 4.0). Unrelated, but.. --=20 wbr, pluknet