From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Sep 18 06:07:34 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id GAA00933 for questions-outgoing; Wed, 18 Sep 1996 06:07:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from saratoga.compassnet.com (nguyept@saratoga.compassnet.com [198.66.160.253]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id GAA00903 for ; Wed, 18 Sep 1996 06:07:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nguyept@localhost) by saratoga.compassnet.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id IAA11282; Wed, 18 Sep 1996 08:03:03 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 18 Sep 1996 08:03:02 -0500 (CDT) From: Peter Nguyen To: Warren Toomey cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance in 586 ("Pentium series") (fwd) In-Reply-To: <9609180521.AA05676@dolphin> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I have the Lai and Baker's paper from the 1996 Usenix - Winter Conference. This paper did exactly what you are trying to do. Peter Nguyen On Wed, 18 Sep 1996, Warren Toomey wrote: > ----- Forwarded message from Claus Rugani Topke ----- > > From: claus@rio.cos.ufrj.br (Claus Rugani Topke) > Subject: Performance in 586 ("Pentium series") > > I'm a student of Computer Science and have installed so many OS and test them... > I saw your work on FreeBSD and I think that is very important for everybody. > So , Now i'm working on performace test, and i saw something in the source > code for 586 and 686 for seting the registers and counters on performance chip.. > > Have you work on something like that ? > > Best Regards, > Claus R. Topke > > ----- End of forwarded message from Claus Rugani Topke ----- >