From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri May 25 00:09:42 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A0BC106564A
	for <freebsd-jail@freebsd.org>; Fri, 25 May 2012 00:09:42 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from glen.j.barber@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-qc0-f182.google.com (mail-qc0-f182.google.com
	[209.85.216.182])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDE4B8FC1B
	for <freebsd-jail@freebsd.org>; Fri, 25 May 2012 00:09:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by qcsg15 with SMTP id g15so333870qcs.13
	for <freebsd-jail@freebsd.org>; Thu, 24 May 2012 17:09:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version
	:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:x-operating-system
	:user-agent; bh=zRtHoJ5dv6R3yaLG+c0uJwR1u9+e14NteDM3xD5qtNQ=;
	b=Wv9iwfEBL/n/aJirzppM8777xHMXEIAZdynat3Uz5MRIRDMERtWsAMt7VGlKqF1APg
	OQ4Y4+alDi819MFRMLvfUDMn8Y1l2JXp/qtgXG+qmRq6NBNFMcjXN2fuCmgtZOGXFRUh
	7O3aac8UrzdorQet3Nl+REAYxHG4Nu8SVZRQFuXGHM0Vhh3M10Er5DkCMKntseG9rdhO
	WNKFUqwZacolxgaRIQ+JHNyEDwS+Ti/mhI2jI64bpuArK2NJzjiEg1PfHnE/OTGm0uwJ
	3GlKETn1BBYH/VxHGNALkyEpuz4DI5V/rJH6Dm3cuNa1sBBnqnuZ0dPiUzvI5jb2YptK
	bMgw==
Received: by 10.224.206.198 with SMTP id fv6mr12815228qab.6.1337904581287;
	Thu, 24 May 2012 17:09:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from schism.local (c-76-124-49-145.hsd1.pa.comcast.net.
	[76.124.49.145])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gb7sm10497893qab.12.2012.05.24.17.09.39
	(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 24 May 2012 17:09:40 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 20:09:38 -0400
From: Glen Barber <glen.j.barber@gmail.com>
To: Valeri Galtsev <galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu>
Message-ID: <20120525000937.GA1377@schism.local>
References: <4FBEAC50.4020703@speakeasy.org>
	<CAAN28g1tRFg4n8x4Qm++EWdKqtjqabZMQ0YuoM9v85zg36uR9g@mail.gmail.com>
	<58333.128.135.70.6.1337903105.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <58333.128.135.70.6.1337903105.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu>
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT amd64
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: i386 in jail on amd64
X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" <freebsd-jail.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-jail>,
	<mailto:freebsd-jail-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-jail>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-jail@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-jail-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-jail>,
	<mailto:freebsd-jail-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 00:09:42 -0000

On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 06:45:05PM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> Is there any reason to not use virtual machine (e.g. VirtualBox) with real
> i386 in it instead of jail? Just curious.

Overhead of VirtualBox.

Glen