From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 11 20:17:26 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CEA01065695 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:17:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rtfm.xx@gmail.com) Received: from mail-px0-f194.google.com (mail-px0-f194.google.com [209.85.216.194]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 620B18FC15 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:17:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pxi32 with SMTP id 32so1053182pxi.15 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:17:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=L1zLkBWzDHou7VUsUnA3rWKaZNvR5nHPcNASMN4Ab6M=; b=r9eG6StxDB5cpyfXN6STsbIVh9Kg3fmqaO4O3Rb60tUdc4UC+tFyuFknHtz9ZEC+UJ exvsSZS63rAwEKvCVoz6MmzSvCnLcOVt9Q1v92iJ0aBiYoF7MNglsPzrtM5OQBBXMiuU czsDT1xyuCDqHtT8pcWmPNs8EqRPGZ41eGN74= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=NCoOfz4/1h5A5OhXFTIUADAJ0FKJoA/++KaUE0tSRlG7GD0iJ7iU6NWHvQwvtvyZ73 q8zWIAp73EiTdgQLK7xAtuSKl2JQXuVjqLG1rixvKy/78/I3+arWhmet/my153vQIt2s WVMBne3sSw2WZn5gWrysRVof51jKWGoxmUY9E= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: rtfm.xx@gmail.com Received: by 10.143.27.40 with SMTP id e40mr217935wfj.230.1257970645793; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:17:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4AFAFECD.5020306@delphij.net> References: <15d3bc360911110926m4811574bmaea5e42879340d64@mail.gmail.com> <4AFAFECD.5020306@delphij.net> Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:17:25 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: d6085e262ace165d Message-ID: <15d3bc360911111217p1bc38284md731e3ff89364798@mail.gmail.com> From: Joshua Piccari To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:24:44 +0000 Subject: Re: Wondering how stable x86emu? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:17:26 -0000 On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 10:13 AM, Xin LI wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Joshua Piccari wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Hi all I'm wondering if anybody can comment on when we can expect to >> see x86emu come to a branch other than -CURRENT? Or if anyone has a >> patch for x86emu that would work (even slightly) with 8.0-RC2? I guess >> if nothing else it would be nice to know what files are involved so I >> can make a patch for RC2. >> >> Anyways, any info would be greatly appreciated since I've been waiting >> for something like this for a long time. Great work, and really >> looking forward to it. :D > > I'm not sure what are you referring to... =C2=A0It worked just fine for i= .e. > VESA stuff on amd64, but I think it's too late for 8.0 since it has been > introduced too late. =C2=A0However, it would be a good target for 8.1 I > guess, there are some rough edges but so far it works just fine for me. Yeah, I realized that it probably wouldn't make it to 8.0 but I was wondering if anybody has an unofficial patch that can be used in the meantime. The reason I ask is before it was committed it was a patch for 8.0-BETA3 floating around on the forums. It seems that the patch has been removed since it was committed but I'd hoped someone out there still had it so I could use it with 8.0-RC2. --=20 Joshua A Piccari /dv/