Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 10:24:38 -0400 From: Ryan Steinmetz <zi@FreeBSD.org> To: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "svn-ports-head@freebsd.org" <svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>, Tijl Coosemans <tijl@FreeBSD.org>, "svn-ports-all@freebsd.org" <svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>, "novel@FreeBSD.org" <novel@FreeBSD.org>, "ports-committers@freebsd.org" <ports-committers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r356398 - head/security/vuxml Message-ID: <20140604142438.GA57245@exodus.zi0r.com> In-Reply-To: <51539FB3-D510-479C-A076-87068BD01022@FreeBSD.org> References: <201406031942.s53JgeGI046605@svn.freebsd.org> <20140604103240.6826697f@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <51539FB3-D510-479C-A076-87068BD01022@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On (06/04/14 08:50), Bryan Drewery wrote: > >> On Jun 4, 2014, at 3:32, Tijl Coosemans <tijl@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 3 Jun 2014 19:42:40 +0000 (UTC) Ryan Steinmetz wrote: >>> Author: zi >>> Date: Tue Jun 3 19:42:40 2014 >>> New Revision: 356398 >>> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/356398 >>> QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r356398/ >>> >>> Log: >>> - Document vulnerability in security/gnutls3 (CVE-2014-3466) >> >> Is security/gnutls affected by this as well? Because most ports are >> still using that version. > >Not sure. That port needs to just die though and all ports use the new. GnuTLS' website doesn't mention 2.x, however, I did see someones post that mentioned that the bad code may have been introduced in 1.x. Given that 2.x seems deprecated/unsupported by the authors, I think we really need to push to ditch it. -r -- Ryan Steinmetz PGP: 9079 51A3 34EF 0CD4 F228 EDC6 1EF8 BA6B D028 46D7
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140604142438.GA57245>