From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Feb  9 19:28:10 2005
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9EA1216A4CE; Wed,  9 Feb 2005 19:28:10 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (f170.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.170])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id EC55243D39; Wed,  9 Feb 2005 19:28:09 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j19JS8OH001668;
	Wed, 9 Feb 2005 20:28:08 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
To: Scott Long <scottl@FreeBSD.org>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 09 Feb 2005 12:21:45 MST."
             <420A62C9.80405@freebsd.org> 
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 20:28:08 +0100
Message-ID: <1667.1107977288@critter.freebsd.dk>
Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org
cc: obrien@FreeBSD.org
cc: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/i386 apic_vector.s local_apic.c
	mp_machdep.c src/sys/i386/include apicvar.h smp.h src/sys/i386/isa
	clock.c 
X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree <cvs-src.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-src@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 19:28:10 -0000

In message <420A62C9.80405@freebsd.org>, Scott Long writes:

>I did some testing under an earlier version of this work and found no
>appreciable change in things like I/O and network thoroughput.  What you
>committed is actually more efficient, so there might indeed be a (small)
>gain.

I ran a short round of specialized benchmarks (interrupt latency etc)
and found nothing statistically significant, but a tendency in favour
of the patch.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.