From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Sep  2  9:59:41 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from caxton.correionet.com.br (caxton.correionet.com.br [200.246.35.7])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD58315C6A
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu,  2 Sep 1999 09:59:35 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from morte@correionet.com.br)
Received: from caxton.correionet.com.br (caxton.correionet.com.br [200.246.35.7])
	by caxton.correionet.com.br (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA42224;
	Thu, 2 Sep 1999 13:58:19 -0300 (EST)
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 13:58:19 -0300 (EST)
From: Luiz Morte da Costa Junior <morte@correionet.com.br>
To: Bill Fumerola <billf@jade.chc-chimes.com>
Cc: Pete Mckenna <pmckenna@uswest.net>,
	Kevin Lynn <klynn@santacruz.org>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: L440GX+ Server Board
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9909011627050.66968-100000@jade.chc-chimes.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9909021356540.32420-100000@caxton.correionet.com.br>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Wed, 1 Sep 1999, Bill Fumerola wrote:

> On Wed, 1 Sep 1999, Luiz Morte da Costa Junior wrote:
> 
> > > The onboard NIC works like any other Intel 10/100 using fxp0, adding a
> > > asecond nic makes the onboard fxp1 (for failover purposes, I assume) 
> > 
> > I think that I don't have problem with my NIC (Intel 10/100).
> 
> The bus that the onboard NIC is on probably gets probed later then
> then the expansion bus. 

I'm using only the onboard NIC. I didn't add any other NIC in my server.

[]s,

Luiz Morte da Costa Junior
Analista de Redes                E-mail: morte@correionet.com.br
Telefone: +55 19 754-2532        Fax: +55 19 255-7576
CorreioNet - Correio Popular     Campinas - SP - Brazil



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message