From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 27 07:43:25 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF72316A4CF for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 07:43:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cs1.cs.huji.ac.il (cs1.cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.16.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67CD543D39 for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 07:43:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: from pampa.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.80.32]) by cs1.cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp id 1DFSQe-000746-38; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 09:43:24 +0200 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.0 06/18/2004 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Bruce Campbell In-Reply-To: Message from Bruce Campbell <1111859340.4245a08c1e247@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 09:43:23 +0200 From: Danny Braniss Message-ID: cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: WIFI access software X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 07:43:26 -0000 > > There is this thing I wrote, called the NAA (network authentication appliance) > > http://www.freebsd.uwaterloo.ca/twiki/bin/view/Freebsd/NetworkAuthenticationApp > liance > > To my knowledge nobody outside of our site uses it. But we use it > for all all wireless access at the University of Waterloo. > > It also supports this thing I wrote called the "Toilet Tank Traffic Shaper" > > http://www.freebsd.uwaterloo.ca/twiki/bin/view/Freebsd/ToiletTankTrafficShaper > > which is handy to keep the dvd downloaders in check. > > Installation of the NAA is not yet at the "make; make install" > stage. Rather "do all these steps, think, do some more, test, > hmm, fix this, call the developer, ok it's almost working now". > > So, you are welcome to contact me if you try the NAA, and get > stuck. We seem to have similar problems :-), I was wondering if you have made any progress on the VPN front? danny