From owner-freebsd-current Sat May 9 01:34:23 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA13149 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sat, 9 May 1998 01:34:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA13138 for ; Sat, 9 May 1998 01:34:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@whistle.com) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by alpo.whistle.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id BAA15455; Sat, 9 May 1998 01:23:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from current1.whistle.com(207.76.205.22) via SMTP by alpo.whistle.com, id smtpd015452; Sat May 9 08:23:05 1998 Date: Sat, 9 May 1998 01:22:41 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer To: Takeshi Yamada cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Soft update code looking very stable In-Reply-To: <19980509115659K.ken@ns1.tydfam.machida.tokyo.jp> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG send me your conf file and I'll build you a kernel If you cannot crash that then we need to find source differences. if you can, then we need to understand what is different with you machine and mine.. On Sat, 9 May 1998, Takeshi Yamada wrote: > I experienced the same problem without any j options - > lock up and no response during "make buildworld". (Mine is > May 8th -current source with 2 source codes from ~julian. > P6@200Mhz 128MBDRAM, ASUSP6NP5 MB) > > I thought that -j option might solve the problem first, but it > did not. And I feel that it is nothing to do with -j option. > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message