From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 11 11:26:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A6151065673 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 11:26:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aehlig@linta.de) Received: from linta.de (isilmar-3.linta.de [188.40.101.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B46708FC0A for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 11:26:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19121 invoked by uid 10); 11 Mar 2011 10:59:18 -0000 Received: from curry.linta.de by isilmar.linta.de with BSMTP; 11 Mar 2011 10:59:18 -0000 Received: by curry.linta.de (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A4B8F1CC42; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 10:59:02 +0000 (GMT) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 10:59:02 +0000 From: "Klaus T. Aehlig" To: ports@freebsd.org, erwin@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110311105902.GB99056@curry.linta.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Subject: science/libctl marked as BROKEN, but does build on 8.2-STABLE amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 11:26:01 -0000 Hallo, I'm looking for someone, who can give me some background information on why science/libctl is marked as broken. According to cvs, this was committed by erwin@ on 2011/02/25 09:30:06 saying "Mark BROKEN: does not build". However, I found that by saying NO_IGNORE=YES it builds and installs perfectly. Since I couldn't find the logs of the original build failure, I made a test build in my tinderbox (for 8.2-STABLE amd64 only) and found it without problem, simply removing the BROKEN line. I've copied the log to my server, see http://www.linta.de/~aehlig/download/uucp/tinderboxlogs/20110311-libctl-3.1.log Can anyone shed more light on why this port is marked BROKEN? If not, I'd suggest to unbreak it at least for this particular architecture. Best regards, Klaus