From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 26 17:10:25 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4771106566C for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 17:10:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maurovale@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f217.google.com (mail-ew0-f217.google.com [209.85.219.217]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61A0B8FC19 for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 17:10:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maurovale@gmail.com) Received: by ewy17 with SMTP id 17so895716ewy.43 for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 10:10:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=VNJIhVuscZgiiDE+Tr0W52L+F7lezgWydLGeHOCz2dM=; b=fR3DHKU2g5CCIBoYwSJfdwQ/PeF6pbDgzr0u1683Hr76qfL4Xt6Fc3RDkJU3UxT/hU fuye1t+OSsswi4nxL5D9zDqIRviHmldlo3HDls4rZUwgdPG3/8ppNOhz1M/XyttspYof vuseOj0uFrLA2QpnD83KXn2W4FoDZrkYT6WCA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=sbrcR/bVKaj3nbJdJrnSHQsLxnOu4DqmA5WSWZFdP9NAm5HC/vuCYc1Rhd9UTp4dpu BONrbd92Oofx8ayXUe2GgC205imAF1zipIGhnnCPoyNxjPn6yyCjxTnU6rdN92mUzl1/ peEfk/+5VZ3sscg1GVJogoi+JM2bSR1LqKfD8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.71.83 with SMTP id q61mr1495935wed.14.1248626345857; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 09:39:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 17:39:05 +0100 Message-ID: <85d001330907260939p2c9f34d6g5d438e8e543b589e@mail.gmail.com> From: "M. Vale" To: barbara Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current , "glen.j.barber" Subject: Re: FreeBSD-8 and portsnap X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 17:10:26 -0000 Hi, I can also confirm thist, after isntaling FreeBSD 8 and doing portsnap fetch, then portsnap extract, If I do: cd /usr/ports then: make search name=kde4 (for example) It says there is no index, to make fetchindex. If I make fetchindex it works ok. But also works if I type again: portsnap extract Only occurs with a fresh install and in the first time you do portsnap fetch, portsnap extract. Hope it helps 2009/7/26, barbara : >> On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Kamigishi Rei >> wrote: >> > barbara wrote: >> >> >> >> If you remove those files and run portsnap fetch update again, you will >> >> find only fresh INDEX-[5-7]. >> >> Maybe it's caused by the fact INDEX-8 is not built on portsnap servers, >> >> but I really don't know. >> >> >> > >> > Apparently, I can confirm this. >> > I use portsnap fetch extract to populate my /usr/ports tree on all my >> > systems, and on 8-CURRENT machines 8-INDEX seems missing. >> > >> >> Out of curiosity, does 'portsnap fetch update -I' restore INDEX-8? I >> am not in front of my machine to test, at the moment. >> > > No, it doesn't. > > After looking at /etc/portsnap.conf, I tried adding 'INDEX INDEX-8 > DESCRIBE.8' at the end, but I', getting this message: > > Building new INDEX files... DESCRIBE.8 not provided by portsnap server; > INDEX-8 not being generated. > > And in /var/db/portsnap/tINDEX there is no DESCRIBE.8. > So maybe this DESCRIBE.8 should be created on the server and included in the > snapshot. > > Barbara > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >