From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 14:40:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54E5016A420 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 14:40:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joerg@britannica.bec.de) Received: from hydra.bec.de (www.ostsee-abc.de [62.206.222.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BDA243D58 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 14:40:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joerg@britannica.bec.de) Received: from britannica.bec.de (unknown [139.30.252.72]) by hydra.bec.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4872835707 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:40:01 +0100 (CET) Received: by britannica.bec.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2B3DD6C1E5; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:39:55 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:39:55 +0100 From: joerg@britannica.bec.de To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060227143954.GA812@britannica.bec.de> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <21474364.1141046445548.JavaMail.root@vms071.mailsrvcs.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <21474364.1141046445548.JavaMail.root@vms071.mailsrvcs.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Subject: Re: Re: unversal watchdog X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 14:40:05 -0000 On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 07:20:45AM -0600, Sergey Babkin wrote: > Well, it's been a long story now. Every time someone comes > with the idea of adding init to BSD, other people feel very > strongly that they hate init and that it must not be in BSD. /sbin/init existed on BSD almost forever. You could fake a tty to use it for restarting the programs. But the real issue is what restart functionality the OP really wants. There's more than one way to do it and whether the SysV init approach is appropiate depends. E.g. what happens if some part of the configuration is rejected and the daemon just spins? Joerg