Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 09 May 2003 21:53:22 +0200
From:      Matthias Andree <ma@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de>
To:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Cc:        Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de>
Subject:   Re: nntpcache broken on sparc64
Message-ID:  <m3znlvc2x9.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030509062805.GB19900@rot13.obsecurity.org> (Kris Kennaway's message of "Thu, 8 May 2003 23:28:05 -0700")
References:  <20030508205123.GD17270@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030508233945.A76300@newtrinity.zeist.de> <20030508221900.GA17740@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030509082219.H427@newtrinity.zeist.de> <20030509062805.GB19900@rot13.obsecurity.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> writes:

> Odd.  Can anyone else confirm the port compiles on a clean,
> up-to-date, default sparc installation?  Since this breakage is new,
> it can only be something very recent, so an out-of-date installation
> or one with old installed files may not see the problem.

Should there be a target "make cleancruft" to complement "make
installworld" that cleans out obsolete include files, libraries,
commands... -- or do it the Linux way and include the base system in
package management (which may introduce interesting bootstrapping
problems).

Of course, ls -lt | tail and rm work, but I think that it's something
that's usually neglected.

-- 
Matthias Andree



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m3znlvc2x9.fsf>