Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 21:53:22 +0200 From: Matthias Andree <ma@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de> Subject: Re: nntpcache broken on sparc64 Message-ID: <m3znlvc2x9.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org> In-Reply-To: <20030509062805.GB19900@rot13.obsecurity.org> (Kris Kennaway's message of "Thu, 8 May 2003 23:28:05 -0700") References: <20030508205123.GD17270@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030508233945.A76300@newtrinity.zeist.de> <20030508221900.GA17740@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030509082219.H427@newtrinity.zeist.de> <20030509062805.GB19900@rot13.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> writes: > Odd. Can anyone else confirm the port compiles on a clean, > up-to-date, default sparc installation? Since this breakage is new, > it can only be something very recent, so an out-of-date installation > or one with old installed files may not see the problem. Should there be a target "make cleancruft" to complement "make installworld" that cleans out obsolete include files, libraries, commands... -- or do it the Linux way and include the base system in package management (which may introduce interesting bootstrapping problems). Of course, ls -lt | tail and rm work, but I think that it's something that's usually neglected. -- Matthias Andree
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m3znlvc2x9.fsf>