From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 26 23:27:00 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFBF6106564A for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 23:26:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cyko@cykotix.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCDE08FC08 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 23:26:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iyb11 with SMTP id 11so5142178iyb.13 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 16:26:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.168.5 with SMTP id u5mr1689905icy.510.1309130818649; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 16:26:58 -0700 (PDT) Sender: cyko@cykotix.com Received: by 10.231.30.73 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 16:26:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [69.133.3.144] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 19:26:58 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: i1ZfL49LbUjGgt8ejVHkMZFlJCo Message-ID: From: Patrick Lahni To: Adrian Chadd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: iwn and hostap X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 23:27:00 -0000 On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Just make sure you run -HEAD. > > > Adrian > > On 27 June 2011 06:22, cykotix wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Adrian Chadd > > wrote: > >> > >> On 26 June 2011 23:26, Patrick Lahni wrote: > >> > Adhoc is supported. According to iwn(4): > >> > > >> > iwn supports station, adhoc, and monitor mode operation. > >> > > >> > I wasn't sure if that means, just for now? Or is hostap not planned > for > >> > these cards supported by iwn? > >> > >> The card runs closed-source firmware which we can't get to the insides > >> of. I don't know the exact details, but there may be some features > >> which we can't really get to in order to support proper hostap modes. > >> > >> > >> adrian > > > > > > Makes sense. Hopefully I'll have better luck with a AR9280 instead. > Thanks > > for the input. > > > > Patrick > > > I realize this is off topic now, but can I run -HEAD until this is MFC'd and move back to -STABLE at that point? Or is that not really recommended. Patrick