From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 3 17:18:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DFF516A41F; Mon, 3 Oct 2005 17:18:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0177D43D69; Mon, 3 Oct 2005 17:18:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 819707FA; Mon, 3 Oct 2005 12:18:54 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 12:18:54 -0500 To: Poul-Henning Kamp Message-ID: <20051003171854.GA18710@soaustin.net> References: <43416038.6020701@root.org> <93558.1128359003@critter.freebsd.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <93558.1128359003@critter.freebsd.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Robert Watson , Nate Lawson , Olivier Houchard Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/ddb db_command.c db_output.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 17:18:57 -0000 On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 07:03:23PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > There are pro etc con for both methods. Once a dump has been sitting > in a PR for a year, very few people tend to have compatible info > tools available. The counterpoint would be that after a dump has been sitting in a PR for a year, the source base will often have drifted so much that any prior investigative work needs to be re-run. I'm hardly arguing against either solution here -- anything that we can do to cut out one email round-trip on e.g. the i386/kern PRs can only help us. mcl