Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 07 Oct 2016 21:03:57 +0200
From:      Matthias Fechner <idefix@fechner.net>
To:        Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: www/drush looking for commiter
Message-ID:  <CF4AE3C4-3683-4928-8ED5-09519D651563@fechner.net>
In-Reply-To: <20161007183533.GF85563@home.opsec.eu>
References:  <b30df7c1-893f-cce9-1db1-1715342f09b2@fechner.net> <20161007183533.GF85563@home.opsec.eu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thanks!

Am 7. Oktober 2016 20:35:33 MESZ, schrieb Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>:
>Hi!
>
>> looking for a commiter for:
>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213254
>
>Done.
>
>-- 
>pi@opsec.eu            +49 171 3101372                         4 years
>to go !

-- 
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org  Fri Oct  7 20:13:32 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFCB9BED1BF
 for <freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Fri,  7 Oct 2016 20:13:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu)
Received: from smtp10.server.rpi.edu (gateway.canit.rpi.edu [128.113.2.230])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "canit.localdomain", Issuer "canit.localdomain" (not verified))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95DF6D84
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Fri,  7 Oct 2016 20:13:31 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu)
Received: from smtp-auth3.server.rpi.edu (route.canit.rpi.edu [128.113.2.233])
 by smtp10.server.rpi.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8) with ESMTP id
 u97K7Kc6025395
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); 
 Fri, 7 Oct 2016 16:07:20 -0400
Received: from smtp-auth3.server.rpi.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by smtp-auth3.server.rpi.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 647E75815A;
 Fri,  7 Oct 2016 16:07:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead-qc124.netel.rpi.edu [128.113.124.17])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: drosih)
 by smtp-auth3.server.rpi.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4CF2C5813E;
 Fri,  7 Oct 2016 16:07:20 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Garance A Drosehn" <drosih@rpi.edu>
To: "Dave Horsfall" <dave@horsfall.org>
Cc: "FreeBSD Ports" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: What sort of a hog is Ruby?
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2016 16:07:19 -0400
Message-ID: <0ABC8709-8EC0-4358-BEFC-F7FEB316CE46@rpi.edu>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.11.1610071733390.983@aneurin.horsfall.org>
References: <alpine.BSF.2.11.1610071733390.983@aneurin.horsfall.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.5r5263)
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: outgoing, @@RPTN)
X-Spam-Score: 0.00 () [Hold at 10.10] 
X-CanIt-Incident-Id: 03RQI7kH5
X-CanIt-Geo: ip=128.113.124.17; country=US; region=New York; city=Troy;
 latitude=42.7495; longitude=-73.5951;
 http://maps.google.com/maps?q=42.7495,-73.5951&z=6
X-CanItPRO-Stream: outgoing
X-Canit-Stats-ID: Bayes signature not available
X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 128.113.2.230
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>;
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2016 20:13:32 -0000

On 7 Oct 2016, at 2:35, Dave Horsfall wrote:

> Looks like I need to upgrade it for security issues; so I tried to compile
> it from the ports area.
>
> First it blew out my disk space (the "work" sub-directory), so when I
> rearranged a few things to make more room it blew out my swap space!
>
> On my box /tmp is "tmpfs" i.e. use memory first before overflowing into
> swap; that's going to be trickier to fix...  I guess I'll have to kludge
> /tmp as a symlink into /usr/local or something, where I have heaps of
> room.

The size of ruby compared to <what>?
How big is the partition with /usr/ports on it?
What size is your swap area?

> On the other hand I guess I could figure out what requires Ruby,
> and decide whether I really need it.

I do not know much about the 'pkg' command, but it looks
like you could try:
   pkg info lang/ruby\*

Which for me lists:
   ruby-2.2.5_1,1
   ruby21-2.1.9_1,1

Then to see what ruby depends on, try:
   pkg query %dn ruby
   pkg query %dn ruby21    #  if it was listed above

Which for me lists these ports as dependencies *of* ruby
(you need to build these ports before building ruby):
   libedit
   openssl
   libyaml
   libffi
   libexecinfo

ruby itself isn't too large, but if building ruby means that
you need to build those ports, then the build of all of that
will chew up a lot more resources (both disk space and swap).

If you want to find out what packages depend on ruby, try:
   pkg query %rn ruby

which for me (on my machines) lists:
   ruby22-bdb
   portupgrade

Portupgrade is what I use to build freebsd ports, so I would not
be dropping that anytime soon.

>
> What sort of disk farms do these developers have?  I'm only a small-time
> user and wannabe developer...

I don't know about "these developers", but I've been building
ruby on freebsd for about as long as the language has been
available, and right now I'm doing that on one modest PC which
I bought back in 2008, and also on one pretty small virtual
machine (which is an off-site hot backup of the first machine).

Ruby isn't tiny, but building it has never been a problem on
any of my systems, ever.  I seem to remember that I have run
into issues when I went to build some port which in turn built
many other ports, but that was quite some time ago.  Maybe that
is what you're seeing.

-- 
Garance Alistair Drosehn                =     drosih@rpi.edu
Senior Systems Programmer               or   gad@FreeBSD.org
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute;             Troy, NY;  USA



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CF4AE3C4-3683-4928-8ED5-09519D651563>