From owner-freebsd-current  Sat Oct 23 22: 4:39 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68B8B14C94
	for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 22:04:37 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA00592;
	Sat, 23 Oct 1999 22:04:29 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com)
To: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>
Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>,
	Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>,
	freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: trek73 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 23 Oct 1999 21:53:43 PDT."
             <199910240453.VAA09641@dingo.cdrom.com> 
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 1999 22:04:29 -0700
Message-ID: <588.940741469@localhost>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> No.  Make it a port.  Policy, remember? 8)

I guess the anti-bloatists would have a point on this one...

I would not object to a port.  It certainly eliminates the
bike shed arguments over it.

- Jordan


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message