Date: Sat, 28 Sep 1996 23:04:00 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org (FreeBSD hackers) Subject: Re: Quick question about getopt Message-ID: <199609290504.XAA01299@rover.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 29 Sep 1996 06:32:55 %2B0200." <199609290432.GAA05625@uriah.heep.sax.de> References: <199609290432.GAA05625@uriah.heep.sax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199609290432.GAA05625@uriah.heep.sax.de> J Wunsch writes: : Except that all tools that compare the result against EOF should also : be changed to compare it against -1 then. In theory, it's even : possible that some of the tools don't require <stdio.h> no longer then : (since this was also the rationale behind the Posix change). Agreed. : So Warner, this is certainly the part of the task that requires more : work than changing a man page. ;-) Agreed. : Yep, you are allowed to commit to : the entire tree, except that changes like the merge of 4.4-Lite2 : should be planned carefully, and discussed with Peter Wemm before. : (Speaking from own bad experience...) OK. I hope the cat stuff I did doesn't conflict with other work being done. Is Peter acting as the CVS meister, or as the 4.4 lite 2 Meister (or both)? Any 4.4lite2 sources I brought in, I'd planned on doing via: cvs import blah/blah/blah CSRG bsd_44_lite_2 to match other tags I've seen in the tree. Then, if my past experience is any guide, I'd just have to do a cvs update -j bsd_44_lite -j bsd_44_lite_2 after checking out the current source. However, that won't always work and many times you have to do that by hand give how much the sources have changes since 4.4Lite. Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199609290504.XAA01299>