From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Nov 2 6:32:16 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from righi.dhs.org (RIGHI.DF.UNIBO.IT [137.204.49.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB67E153C0 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 1999 06:32:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsd@righi.dhs.org) Received: from localhost (bsd@localhost) by righi.dhs.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA91739; Tue, 2 Nov 1999 15:31:35 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from bsd@righi.dhs.org) Date: Tue, 2 Nov 1999 15:31:35 +0100 (CET) From: FreeBSD Mailing list To: "O.Trofileeva" Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: OSPF In-Reply-To: <199911011444.RAA13045@sinshost.sins.ru> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I think you can use them as default routes. I think gated would be useful but why don;t you use CISCO routers for such a topic? For example a CISCO 7200 The difficulty I think is in setting them up. You will have to set manually which is hte default router for a group of machines and which is the other default router for the other group of machines. A machine on a subnet cannot use more than a default route the same time I think. regards Rick On Mon, 1 Nov 1999, O.Trofileeva wrote: > We have two channels to Internet from one subnet. They are of different > bandwidth. Can we use them both as default routes (routes to Internet)? I > mean simultaneous traffic via both routes in accounting the bandwidth of > each. Would be gated (OSPF) useful here? > > Thanks, > Olga Trofileeva > Special Information Service > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message