Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 13:29:43 +0200 (CEST) From: "Ganael LAPLANCHE" <ganael.laplanche@martymac.org> To: Paolo Bormida <pbormida@gmail.com> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: amule-10275 Message-ID: <20100922112647.M64392@martymac.org> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinNPgm5pJS-OY28t5fScwtv%2BKHg-rXeBMqJd9Ht@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTinNPgm5pJS-OY28t5fScwtv%2BKHg-rXeBMqJd9Ht@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:42:37 +0200, Paolo Bormida wrote > To: ganael.laplanche@martymac.org Hi Paolo, (this is a re-post of my previous, private answer) I am sorry but I am no more the maintainer of aMule. You should get in touch with swell.k@gmail.com, who is the new maintainer. > Sorry to bother you, but I think I understood the problem I described > in this post to the freebsd forums: > > http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=17961 > > Does amule2 port switched from a stable 2.2.5 release to a daily snapshot? > Does the sparc64 port still has the daily snapshot instad of the more > up-to-date 2.2.6_4 available? You can find the history of the changes made to this port on Freshports here : http://www.freshports.org/net-p2p/amule2 Yes, the ports seems to have switched to using a code snapshot on Aug, 13 2010 with version r.10266, leaving version 2.2.6 behind. Best regards, Ganael LAPLANCHE ganael.laplanche@martymac.org http://www.martymac.org | http://contribs.martymac.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100922112647.M64392>