From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 24 08:32:07 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 050AB16A4B3 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 08:32:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gw.celabo.org (gw.celabo.org [208.42.49.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1480643FE5 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 08:32:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nectar@celabo.org) Received: from madman.celabo.org (madman.celabo.org [10.0.1.111]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "madman.celabo.org", Issuer "celabo.org CA" (verified OK)) by gw.celabo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8574A54861; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 10:32:05 -0500 (CDT) Received: by madman.celabo.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id BC2676D454; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 10:32:04 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 10:32:04 -0500 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: D J Hawkey Jr Message-ID: <20030924153204.GE57702@madman.celabo.org> References: <3F705D4D.4070404@tenebras.com> <20030923205318.GB3346@scylla.towardex.com> <20030924091603.GC22622@starjuice.net> <20030924142015.GC57288@madman.celabo.org> <20030924142717.GA9026@sheol.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030924142717.GA9026@sheol.localdomain> X-Url: http://www.celabo.org/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i-ja.1 cc: security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenSSH: multiple vulnerabilities in the new PAM code X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting] List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 15:32:07 -0000 On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 09:27:17AM -0500, D J Hawkey Jr wrote: > On Sep 24, at 09:20 AM, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 11:16:03AM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > > > On (2003/09/23 16:53), Haesu wrote: > > > > > > > Oh jee, here we go again. Hey, at least patched 3.5p1 on FreeBSD > > > > 4.8/4.9 are not effected :) > > > > > > Since -CURRENT's using a modified OpenSSH_3.6.1p1, I don't think this > > > issue affects FreeBSD at all. > > > > Unfortunately, it _does_ affect us. The PAM code in OpenSSH 3.7x was > > taken from FreeBSD's PAM code. des@ is working the issue now. > > But just "portable", right? No, not just OpenSSH-portable. > Or are any "core" OpenSSHes across various > FreeBSD releases also vulnerable? I'm only talking about the base system OpenSSH above (which is based on OpenSSH-portable), but both `openssh' and `openssh-portable' in the Ports Collection are likely affected, as they contain the same code (brought in by the port maintainer). Cheers, -- Jacques Vidrine . NTT/Verio SME . FreeBSD UNIX . Heimdal nectar@celabo.org . jvidrine@verio.net . nectar@freebsd.org . nectar@kth.se