From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 18 06:49:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C20616A4DA for ; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 06:49:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from novel@smtp.hispeed.ch) Received: from smtp.hispeed.ch (mxout.hispeed.ch [62.2.95.247]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE2A543D58 for ; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 06:49:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from novel@smtp.hispeed.ch) Received: from coredump.fannet.ru (R1-Vl6-82-116-56-21.fannet.ru [82.116.56.21]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.hispeed.ch (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.6/taifun-1.0) with ESMTP id k7I6noFm004417; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 08:49:53 +0200 Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 10:50:18 +0400 From: Roman Bogorodskiy To: Paul Schmehl Message-ID: <20060818065018.GB78016@underworld.novel.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Paul Schmehl , Kris Kennaway , ports@freebsd.org References: <20060816123335.GA42090@underworld.novel.ru> <20060816172835.GA29719@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060817053955.GD62148@underworld.novel.ru> <20060817124739.GA3643@xor.obsecurity.org> <44E47FFB.2090107@utdallas.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <44E47FFB.2090107@utdallas.edu> X-PGP: http://people.freebsd.org/~novel/novel.key.asc X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on smtp-08.tornado.cablecom.ch X-Virus-Status: Clean X-DCC-spamcheck-01.tornado.cablecom.ch-Metrics: smtp-08.tornado.cablecom.ch 1377; Body=3 Fuz1=3 Fuz2=3 Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: ports tree tagging again X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 06:49:55 -0000 Paul Schmehl wrote: > As a maintainer of several ports, I can assure you that I would not be=20 > interested in doing *more* work on the ports than I already am. And my= =20 > ports are relatively simple ones. Imagine the guys who do KDE and Gnome= =20 > and Xorg being asked to at least double their work..... I know that Gnome and Xorg people has their own repo. That could be avoided if we had two branches. =20 > Sometimes you have to keep in mind that we're all volunteers here and=20 > many of us are already very busy with paying jobs as well. >=20 > If someone wants to pay my salary, I'd be happy to work on FreeBSD stuff= =20 > fulltime. Blah.