From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Jan 7 02:57:10 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA06259 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Thu, 7 Jan 1999 02:57:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from haldjas.folklore.ee (Haldjas.folklore.ee [193.40.6.121]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA06241 for ; Thu, 7 Jan 1999 02:56:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee) Received: from haldjas.folklore.ee (haldjas.folklore.ee [172.17.2.1] (may be forged)) by haldjas.folklore.ee (8.8.8/8.8.4) with SMTP id MAA04095; Thu, 7 Jan 1999 12:55:39 +0200 (EET) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 12:55:39 +0200 (EET) From: Narvi To: fn@hungry.com cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Winchip. In-Reply-To: <19990107051341.27476.qmail@terror.hungry.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 6 Jan 1999 fn@hungry.com wrote: > > Does FreeBSD work on Winchip systems? > > A cursory examination of the mailing list archives (and /sys/i386/i386/*) > didn't reveal anything related to it. > Haven't tested it - it is just not possible here to get any alternative x86 chips but AMD, and then probably only because of a big bunch of crazy overclockers. But I guess it should work OK, provided you have options CPU_486 & CPU_386 in the kernel. Sander There is no love, no good, no happiness and no future - all these are just illusions. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message