From owner-cvs-src Tue Mar 4 14:21: 1 2003 Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAA1E37B401; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 14:20:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (pobrecita.freebsd.ru [194.87.13.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B52043FDF; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 14:20:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ache@pobrecita.freebsd.ru) Received: from pobrecita.freebsd.ru (ache@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nagual.pp.ru (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h24MKuVa051971; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 01:20:56 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache@pobrecita.freebsd.ru) Received: (from ache@localhost) by pobrecita.freebsd.ru (8.12.8/8.12.6/Submit) id h24MKugd051970; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 01:20:56 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache) Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 01:20:55 +0300 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" To: Mike Barcroft , src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libutil login.conf.5 Message-ID: <20030304222055.GA51866@nagual.pp.ru> References: <20030303095422.GA20923@nagual.pp.ru> <20030303101518.GA8214@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030303103819.GA22044@nagual.pp.ru> <20030303115011.GA8705@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030303120707.GA24280@nagual.pp.ru> <20030303122609.GA9305@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030303130643.GA25214@nagual.pp.ru> <20030303112151.E49156@espresso.bsdmike.org> <20030303164828.GA28881@nagual.pp.ru> <20030304212957.GA40993@HAL9000.homeunix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030304212957.GA40993@HAL9000.homeunix.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 13:29:57 -0800, David Schultz wrote: > I gather from your previous email that you basically want an > authoritative list of yet-to-be-supported capabilities, so that if > third parties implement them, they will make them conform to the > list. While I don't agree that this sort of thing belongs in the > documentation, I don't have a problem with the idea, as long as it > is very clear that they are not supported, and I certainly don't > want to argue about it. What do you think about the following > patch? Looks ok. I think "minpassword*" belongs to this list too, and I think that some clarification needed when PAM mentioned, something like phrase "for base system utilities" to not produce confusion that PAM is required for login.conf. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-src" in the body of the message