Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 14 Oct 2008 08:01:34 -0700 (PDT)
From:      mdh <mdh_lists@yahoo.com>
To:        Unga <unga888@yahoo.com>, Jeremy Chadwick <koitsu@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: An endian error
Message-ID:  <709604.78360.qm@web56805.mail.re3.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <20081014125042.GA50163@icarus.home.lan>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--- On Tue, 10/14/08, Jeremy Chadwick <koitsu@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> From: Jeremy Chadwick <koitsu@FreeBSD.org>
> Subject: Re: An endian error
> To: "Unga" <unga888@yahoo.com>
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Date: Tuesday, October 14, 2008, 8:50 AM
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 05:00:26AM -0700, Unga wrote:
> > Hi all
> > 
> > I'm trying to compile RELENG_7 kernel on i386.
> > 
> > The "make buildkernel" develops an endian
> related error:
> 
> I cannot reproduce this error on any of our i386 boxes or
> our amd64
> boxes.
> 
> Is this kernel being built with the new gcc you've been
> messing around
> with in other threads?  I have to ask that question, for
> obvious
> reasons.

I wonder if that code is right - normally an endian check on FreeBSD entails comparing BYTE_ORDER with _BIG_ENDIAN and/or _LITTLE_ENDIAN to determine which is the case, which would seemingly imply that it is OK to have both of those defined.  
- mdh



      



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?709604.78360.qm>