From owner-freebsd-multimedia Thu Jul 29 13:43:23 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Received: from mail2.netcologne.de (mail2.netcologne.de [194.8.194.103]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F6A31511D for ; Thu, 29 Jul 1999 13:43:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from van.woerkom@netcologne.de) Received: from oranje.my.domain (dial4-82.netcologne.de [195.14.233.82]) by mail2.netcologne.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA27250; Thu, 29 Jul 1999 22:40:33 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from marc@localhost) by oranje.my.domain (8.9.3/8.9.3) id WAA01592; Thu, 29 Jul 1999 22:38:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from van.woerkom@netcologne.de) Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 22:38:56 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <199907292038.WAA01592@oranje.my.domain> X-Authentication-Warning: oranje.my.domain: marc set sender to van.woerkom@netcologne.de using -f From: Marc van Woerkom To: mestery@visi.com Cc: freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: (mestery@visi.com) Subject: Re: Gogo vs. Bladeenc, Part II Reply-To: van.woerkom@netcologne.de References: Sender: owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Gogo, which is amazing to me since I previously used bladeenc, which > gave me 2-3:1 times. And there is no difference in the output quality. > Gogo works nice, give it a try. Any explanation for this miracle? . Assembly? . Different psycho-acoustics? (neglecting that stuff that the human ear + mind don't notice too much) Regards, Marc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-multimedia" in the body of the message