From owner-freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Sun Sep 9 23:01:59 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7266B10A1760 for ; Sun, 9 Sep 2018 23:01:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF80984F8D for ; Sun, 9 Sep 2018 23:01:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id B3AF110A175D; Sun, 9 Sep 2018 23:01:58 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: doc@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A273510A175B for ; Sun, 9 Sep 2018 23:01:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 412E884F79 for ; Sun, 9 Sep 2018 23:01:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7068611325 for ; Sun, 9 Sep 2018 23:01:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w89N1veb063204 for ; Sun, 9 Sep 2018 23:01:57 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w89N1vUf063199 for doc@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 9 Sep 2018 23:01:57 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 228535] emulators/virtualbox-ose-kmod: 11.2-BETA3 - kldload vboxdrv leads to panic Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2018 23:01:54 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Documentation X-Bugzilla-Component: Documentation X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: rkoberman@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: doc@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2018 23:01:59 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D228535 --- Comment #16 from rkoberman@gmail.com --- (In reply to Dennis Clarke from comment #15) Now I am completely baffled. I just checked the archive and there was never= a 5.2.12_1. I see no way that the package virtualbox-ose-5.2.12_1 could exist. That said, you need to get the kmod port for 5.2.12. To do that: $ svn update -r 469570 /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose-kmod That will downgrade the port to a version that matches the package for virtualbox-ose. (PORTREVISION should not matter.) Then you can build the po= rt. If you need it on multiple system, do a "make package" so that you will hav= e a package you can just copy to other systems and install with "pkg add /usr/ports/packages/All/virtualbox-ose-kmod-5.2.12.txz". This assumes that = you have not set any environmental variable that overrides the default location. This is a fairly ugly mess that should never have happened. When it did, I think the proper action would have been to build a package of 5.2.12 on an = 11.2 system an put it somewhere on the ftp server. (The same applies to the nVid= ia driver which has a similar issue.) This would have been documented in the errata. But I have no say in this and what you see is what ports-manager chose to d= o. I can make a package you need available, but, if I was you, I would not tru= st a driver from an unknown source. Let me know if you want it, though. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=