From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Apr 22 06:54:08 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id GAA06060
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 22 Apr 1996 06:54:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from suw3svr01.hisd.harris.com (suw3svr01.hisd.harris.com [158.147.19.67])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id GAA06051
          for <freebsd-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com>; Mon, 22 Apr 1996 06:54:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from suw2k.hisd.harris.com by suw3svr01.hisd.harris.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id JAA16836; Mon, 22 Apr 1996 09:51:06 -0400
Received: by suw2k.hisd.harris.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA06758; Mon, 22 Apr 96 09:50:45 EDT
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 96 09:50:45 EDT
From: jleppek@suw2k.hisd.harris.com (James Leppek)
Message-Id: <9604221350.AA06758@suw2k.hisd.harris.com>
To: freebsd-hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org
Subject: could tunnel device do this?
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

This is really a 2 part question:
part 1: what would be the best way to route all IP packets from a ethernet card
	to a process, I am guessing that the tun device could do this.

part 2: what kind of thruput could be expected when doing this? If I had 
	a pentium 166 could it saturate a 10Mbit line? What % of a 100Mbit link.


Thanks,

Jim Leppek