From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 10:42:39 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B170616A4CE; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:42:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.esiee.fr (mail.esiee.fr [147.215.1.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECCC943D2D; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:42:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from f.bonnet@esiee.fr) Received: from localhost.esiee.fr (localhost.esiee.fr [127.0.0.1]) by mail.esiee.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 590C93658E7; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:42:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.esiee.fr (localhost.esiee.fr [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.esiee.fr (VaMailArmor-2.0.1.16) id 83493-130B8B94; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 11:42:35 +0100 Received: from [147.215.1.13] (desolation.esiee.fr [147.215.1.13]) by mail.esiee.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 064213658BE; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:42:32 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <41DD1615.7050908@esiee.fr> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 11:42:29 +0100 From: Frank Bonnet User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hubert Feyrer References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira MailArmor (version: 2.0.1.16; VAE: 6.29.0.5; VDF: 6.29.0.51; host: mail.esiee.fr) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 14:31:35 +0000 cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Benchmark: NetBSD 2.0 beats FreeBSD 5.3 in server performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 10:42:39 -0000 Hubert Feyrer wrote: > > Gregory McGarry asked me to host and advertize this paper for him: > > Abstract: ``With the recent releases of NetBSD 2.0 and FreeBSD 5.3 > operating system, many new and exciting features have been implemented. > Both criticism and commendation on performance, reliability and > scalability have been directed towards these releases. Does NetBSD is able to use an external LDAP server to authenticate users that is use nss_ldap and pam_ldap ? Thanks a lot -- Cordialement/Regards Frank Bonnet