From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Mar 21 04:10:24 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id EAA22049 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 21 Mar 1996 04:10:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from panix.com (panix.com [198.7.0.2]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id EAA22044 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 1996 04:10:22 -0800 (PST) Received: (from jbarrm@localhost) by panix.com (8.7/8.7/PanixU1.3) id HAA29061; Thu, 21 Mar 1996 07:10:17 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 07:10:16 -0500 (EST) From: Barry Masterson To: freebsd-questions cc: Dave Anderson Subject: Re: ssh-1.2.10; ok to run? In-Reply-To: <199603210926.CAA03024@shell.aros.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Thu, 21 Mar 1996, Dave Andersen wrote: > Lo and behold, Barry Masterson once said: > > > saying that the (ports version ssh-1.2.10) is a beta release, and > > may be unstable. There are of course earlier, and later versions > > available, but the port is for 1.2.10 > > Get the later versions (1.2.13 is what we're running). They're easy > to install on FreeBSD, and they don't have the security holes and/or > quick patches to fix the holes that 1.2.10 does. > Sounds good. I suppose that the ports package is ok as is. Other than changing the md5 entry in /ssh/files to 1.2.13, and possibily the PLIST inventory, it should install as advertisied? Also, the 1.2.10 patches are still needed?, and should fit on 1.2.13 ? > > Has anyone, is anyone using it? Any horror stories? > > It's great. > ... > > -Dave Andersen > > -- > angio@aros.net Complete virtual hosting and business-oriented > system administration Internet services. (WWW, FTP, email) > http://www.aros.net/ http://www.aros.net/about/virtual/ > "There are only two industries that refer to thier customers as 'users'." > Barry Masterson jbarrm@panix.com >--->--->--->--->---> FreeBSD 2.1.0 <---<---<---<---<---<