From owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Feb  4 04:35:44 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7ABD57B;
 Tue,  4 Feb 2014 04:35:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pd0-x232.google.com (mail-pd0-x232.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::232])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9411A1036;
 Tue,  4 Feb 2014 04:35:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pd0-f178.google.com with SMTP id y13so7759309pdi.9
 for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 20:35:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=OHp+9m2COKa0VpFwQWCwwx6BkMnAm2wAv3Uk16fG/TM=;
 b=Y1UXdNiCLFIG3tSkoAXpZlr1Px2yIYZ4+l66cxoiWyiIG4M+hA56MYWz6Qr2OZZDVb
 herETfQcJwzQAWJpar1bAuXOsM6bQtDmik4kKT/4G6l9xA97/fye5htBmxLQYPiqJCeF
 eu5Fka80Lly7nlzXt41brbOLFhyYJnsvo5zi5FXFXZRwBDx31LDED7/Ym3aicExfGBIu
 znV1Bl6oR2MpvA69eaNPkHmQ1oY3aqVdP3h409Y+5Jh/oNNvw4EV21F47pmTrNjGbjfg
 z4aTy0OQ1kZH8Ix6Vpb3CV0ZQiSL1wNjI5L9a0+wdgUOzGmxhmIae9f8Bm+cHmS9NA1F
 68tg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.69.19.139 with SMTP id gu11mr7560339pbd.149.1391488544347;
 Mon, 03 Feb 2014 20:35:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.155.38 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 20:35:44 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <52EDE352.9050805@freebsd.org>
References: <CAGBxaXnOrL2SObPJemxzy+_+hr0fePoCKFrHG3Cr-R5t=+uNHQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <52EDB899.9060703@freebsd.org>
 <CAGBxaXnK2ph1-pkHcfFAGqYbF9FiY6Ba3B-WnjuDCDYepK+=Fw@mail.gmail.com>
 <52EDE352.9050805@freebsd.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 23:35:44 -0500
Message-ID: <CAGBxaXmgKBz=CacFGHa-DvxvS6KbEOTOdVVncRbXK72xq_sVOA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: some interesting observations on the relative performance of kvm
 vs. bhyve
From: Aryeh Friedman <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com>
To: Peter Grehan <grehan@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
Cc: "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports."
 <freebsd-virtualization.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-virtualization>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-virtualization-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-virtualization/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-virtualization-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-virtualization-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 04:35:44 -0000

Note on cachemodes it seems to make very little real world difference in
which one you pick.


-- 
Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org