From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Dec 22 01:03:42 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BE2516A418;
	Sat, 22 Dec 2007 01:03:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danny@ricin.com)
Received: from smtpq1.tilbu1.nb.home.nl (smtpq1.tilbu1.nb.home.nl
	[213.51.146.200])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6BDE13C465;
	Sat, 22 Dec 2007 01:03:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danny@ricin.com)
Received: from [213.51.146.189] (port=55595 helo=smtp2.tilbu1.nb.home.nl)
	by smtpq1.tilbu1.nb.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <danny@ricin.com>)
	id 1J5smC-0005RA-Vt; Sat, 22 Dec 2007 02:03:41 +0100
Received: from cp1228410-a.dbsch1.nb.home.nl ([84.27.157.163]:57431
	helo=desktop.homenet)
	by smtp2.tilbu1.nb.home.nl with smtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <danny@ricin.com>)
	id 1J5smB-0003gd-S8; Sat, 22 Dec 2007 02:03:40 +0100
Received: by desktop.homenet (sSMTP sendmail emulation);
	Sat, 22 Dec 2007 02:03:38 +0100
From: "Danny Pansters" <danny@ricin.com>
To: pav@freebsd.org
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7
References: <200712211524.25454.josh@tcbug.org>
	<200712220007.45753.danny@ricin.com>
	<1198283363.95955.11.camel@ikaros.oook.cz>
In-Reply-To: <1198283363.95955.11.camel@ikaros.oook.cz>
X-Face: (Zs+'ncTcchkOX|~t6{?Iii=O!G#WEK!+OD0|-F=i%1pvP5V_Sz4PaJC8o)=?utf-8?q?MiSnH/JMJFy=0A=09oBN-My?=,
	v":S7,
	(=?utf-8?q?mmkPm=27U=7BMgT+eM=2EBd=5Cp/P!dr=5DhOTXqpse21O!=25Ct=60SE=2EOodq?=
	=?utf-8?q?=5Dry=5E=23kU=5E=0A=09-?=<b{m!+|b{i)^67w_UgUwfZ2bJMxh_Xk!0WWaES7oMzlaI7MTODfpr>GT.[8D}i$6P>="
	=?utf-8?q?=23=0A=09*J+4d=7E?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 02:03:38 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200712220203.38658.danny@ricin.com>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Opinion on cross-port OPTIONS CONFLICTS
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 01:03:42 -0000

> I bet most/many non-default ports don't get properly packaged anyway as 
> it is.

I meant: ports with non-default OPTIONS. Sorry.