Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 21:29:54 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com> To: Florent Thoumie <flz@xbsd.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: @unexec equivalent in Makefile ? Message-ID: <20050216212954.7027b0b1@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro> In-Reply-To: <42139EC5.90206@xbsd.org> References: <20050216154212.55c3fe88@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro> <200502161918.43275.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> <20050216204814.164a794b@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro> <421399EC.7090904@xbsd.org> <20050216211700.7337cb8a@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro> <42139EC5.90206@xbsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 20:28:05 +0100 Florent Thoumie <flz@xbsd.org> wrote: [ ... ] > > Note that I do think PLIST_FILES for such a case is really unsexy, > I would stick with a simple pkg-plist. Especially if you port is > going to grow. As Michael said, people likes using grep on pkg-plist. Yes, it's plist now. -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050216212954.7027b0b1>